Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB cervical cancer

7 Sources of evidence considered by the Committee

The Evidence Review Group (ERG) report for this appraisal was prepared by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), Centre for Health Economics (CHE), The University of York:

The following organisations accepted the invitation to participate in this appraisal as consultees and commentators. They were invited to comment on the draft scope, the ERG report and the appraisal consultation document (ACD). Manufacturers or sponsors were also invited to make written submissions. Professional or specialist and patient or carer groups, and other consultees, had the opportunity to give their expert views. Manufacturers or sponsors, professional or specialist and patient or carer groups also have the opportunity to appeal against the final appraisal determination.

Manufacturer or sponsor:

Professional or specialist and patient or carer groups:

Other consultees

Commentator organisations (did not provide written evidence and without the right of appeal)

The following individuals were selected from clinical specialist and patient expert nominations from the non-manufacturer or sponsor consultees and commentators. They gave their expert personal view on topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB carcinoma of the cervix by attending the initial Committee discussion and providing written evidence to the Committee. They were also invited to comment on the ACD.