You are here:

  1. Home
  2. NICE Guidance
  3. Conditions and diseases
  4. Cardiovascular conditions
  5. Heart rhythm conditions

LATITUDE NXT Patient Management System for monitoring cardiac devices at home

  • Medtech innovation briefing
  • Reference number: MIB67
  • Published:  24 May 2016

Download (PDF)
  • Overview
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Technology overview
  • Evidence review
  • Relevance to NICE guidance programmes
  • References
  • Appendix
  • Search strategy and evidence selection
  • About this briefing

References

Akar JG, Bao H, Jones PW et al. (2015) Use of remote monitoring is associated with lower adverse outcomes among patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 8: 1173–79

Boehmer JP, Saxon LA, Lobban J et al. (2014) Clinician response to remote active monitoring in patients with heart failure: Results of the RAPID-RF trial. The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management 5: 1551–60

NHS Choices (2015) Pacemaker implantation [online; accessed 18 February 2016]

De Ruvo E, Sciarra L, Martino AM et al. (2016) A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 45: 81–90

Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR et al. (2010) Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implant and the influence of remote device follow-up: The ALTITUDE survival survey. Circulation 122: 2359–67

Stern S, Kansal AR, Amorosi SL et al. (2013) Remote patient monitoring in CRT-D recipients may reduce use of hospital-based care. Value in Health 16: A520


Next page Appendix Previous page Relevance to NICE guidance programmes
Back to top