Why the committee made these recommendations
Bed frames for adults in acute medical or surgical hospital wards have a range of features to help reduce incidents such as musculoskeletal injuries to the person using the bed or patient falls, pressure ulcers and infections. This assessment aims to determine whether the differences in clinical, economic and non-clinical outcomes attributed to the different features could justify price variation.
The features identified in recommendation 1.1 should be included as standard, as a minimum. These features were highlighted as being important to people using bed frames in the user preference assessment and are not expected to add cost to the bed frame.
In-built weighing scales and bed exit alarms are likely to be drivers of bed frame cost, but evidence of their effectiveness is uncertain. Some groups of people could benefit from these features, but currently there is no evidence to show this.
There is some evidence related to technical outcomes for power drive and turn assistance, but there is no evidence of their impact on user injuries. Connectivity features are likely to be drivers of bed frame cost, but there is no evidence of their impact on safety, effectiveness or resource use. Connectivity features on bed frames may be important in the future to support a digitally integrated NHS. More information is needed to justify price variation between bed frames because of these features.
Bed frames may have other features that are not included in these recommendations. But there is no evidence to justify price variation between bed frames because of any other feature.