How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    Appendix A: Methods and literature search strategy

    Methods and literature search strategy

    NICE has identified studies and reviews relevant to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute heart failure in adults from the medical literature.

    Search strategy design and peer review

    This search report is informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension (PRISMA-S).

    A NICE information specialist ran the literature searches on 18th September 2024. See the search strategy history for the full search strategy for each database. Relevant published studies identified during consultation or resolution that are published after this date may also be considered for inclusion.

    The principal search strategy was developed in MEDLINE ALL (Ovid interface). It was adapted for use in each of the databases listed in table 4a, taking into account the database's size, search functionality and subject coverage. The MEDLINE ALL strategy was quality assured by a NICE senior information specialist. All translated search strategies were peer reviewed to ensure their accuracy. The quality assurance and peer review procedures were adapted from the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) 2015 evidence-based checklist.

    Review management

    The search results were managed in EPPI‑Reviewer version 5 (EPPI‑R5). Duplicates were removed in EPPI‑R5 using a 2‑step process. First, automated deduplication was done using a high-value algorithm. Second, manual deduplication was used to assess low-probability matches. All decisions about inclusion, exclusion and deduplication were recorded and stored.

    Limits and restrictions

    The CENTRAL database search removed trial registry records and conference material. The Embase search excluded conference material. We excluded the following publication types in MEDLINE: letter or historical article or comment or editorial or news or case reports. We excluded letters and editorial from the Embase search. English language limits were applied to the search when possible in the database.

    The search was limited from March 2013 to September 2024. The date limit was included to update searches undertaken for an earlier version of this guidance.

    The limit to remove animal studies in the searches is standard NICE practice, which has been adapted from Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C (1994) Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 309(6964): 1286.

    Inclusion criteria

    The following inclusion criteria were applied to the abstracts identified by the literature search.

    • Publication type: clinical studies were included with emphasis on identifying good quality studies. Abstracts were excluded if they did not report clinical outcomes. Reviews, editorials, and laboratory or animal studies, were also excluded and so were conference abstracts, because of the difficulty of appraising study methodology, unless they reported specific adverse events not available in the published literature.

    • People with cardiac arrest.

    • Intervention or test: VA ECMO.

    • Outcome: articles were retrieved if the abstract contained information relevant to the safety, efficacy, or both.

    If selection criteria could not be determined from the abstracts the full paper was retrieved.

    Potentially relevant studies not included in the main evidence summary are listed in Error! Reference source not found..

    Find out more about how NICE selects the evidence for the committee.